Case report of osteolytic lesions in a patient with multisystem granulomatous disease

  1. Henco Nel 1,
  2. Brad Davis 2,
  3. Brendan Adler 3 and
  4. Eli Gabbay 4
  1. 1 Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia
  2. 2 SKG Radiology, St John of God Subiaco, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
  3. 3 Envision Medical Imaging, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
  4. 4 School of Medicine, University of Notre Dame, Fremantle, Western Australia, Australia
  1. Correspondence to Dr Henco Nel; henco.nel@health.wa.gov.au

Publication history

Accepted:13 May 2021
First published:09 Jun 2021
Online issue publication:09 Jun 2021

Case reports

Case reports are not necessarily evidence-based in the same way that the other content on BMJ Best Practice is. They should not be relied on to guide clinical practice. Please check the date of publication.

Abstract

We present a case of a 70-year-old Caucasian woman with multisystem granulomatous disease involving her lungs, bones and lymph nodes. The patient initially presented with cervical lymphadenopathy and subsequently developed progressive breathlessness. Imaging revealed extensive mediastinal, hilar and intra-abdominal lymphadenopathy as well as bilateral pulmonary parenchymal infiltrates. Lymph node and lung biopsy confirmed non-necrotising granulomatous inflammation while a BAL showed scanty growth of Cryptococcus neoformans and moderate growth of Staphylococcus aureus. The patient received intravenous ceftriaxone and had a good response to treatment. She also completed 3 months of oral fluconazole. Although a diagnosis of sarcoidosis was considered most likely, the patient was not initially started on systemic corticosteroids due to concern around possible infection and initial response to antimicrobials. However, her exercise tolerance gradually deteriorated. A craniofacial CT revealed multiple lytic lesions involving the skull and visualised cervical spine. Biopsy of a clivus lesion revealed non-necrotising granulomatous inflammation while fungal cultures and histopathological stains were negative. The patient was diagnosed with widespread sarcoidosis and she was initiated on prednisolone and methotrexate which led to marked clinical and radiological improvement.

Background

Sarcoidosis is a multisystem disease characterised by non-caseating granulomas. Although lungs and lymph nodes are most commonly affected, the disease can involve any organ system.1 Sinonasal sarcoidosis is relatively rare and the incidence appears to be between 0.7% and 6%.2

However, as the symptoms of patients with sinonasal sarcoidosis resemble the symptoms of chronic rhinitis and chronic inflammatory rhinosinusitis, sinonasal sarcoidosis might be an overlooked disease manifestation.3

Bone involvement is reported in 3%–13% of patients with sarcoidosis.4 Older data suggest that the hands and feet are most commonly affected, with spinal involvement rarely reported.5 However, axial bone involvement may be more common than previously documented, since earlier studies relied mostly on plain X-rays, which may be less sensitive for axial bone lesions.5 Osseous sarcoidosis also appears to be more common in white women and bone involvement is usually diagnosed in middle-aged or elderly patients.5 6

Bone lesions are commonly asymptomatic and patients who have bone involvement may have higher incidences of multiorgan involvement.5 Although osseous sarcoidosis appears to be mainly osteolytic in nature,7 lesions may also appear sclerotic or permeative.5 The radiographic appearance may be indistinguishable from other osteolytic lesions and therefore a biopsy is usually required to confirm the diagnosis.5 8

Skull sarcoidosis is extremely rare, and a recent systematic review yielded only 22 documented cases.5 8 9

No general consensus exists for the treatment of bone or sinonasal sarcoidosis, but corticosteroids are the most commonly prescribed first-line drugs.3 10 Various second-line agents including methotrexate and hydroxychloroquine have been reported useful as steroid sparing agents.3 11 12

Cryptococcus neoformans is a yeast found in soil and pigeon droppings. Inhalation of these organisms may result in pulmonary cryptococcosis and the infection may undergo haematogenous spread to any organ system, including the central nervous system, bones and skin, although this is rare in immunocompetent hosts.13 Cryptococcal lesions of the skeletal system occur in less than 10% of patients with disseminated disease and radiography typically demonstrates osteolytic lesions.14 Although the optimal treatment of cryptococcal pneumonia is uncertain, treatment generally consists of 6–12 months of oral fluconazole.15

This case report raises awareness that although osseous sarcoidosis is uncommon, it can affect any bone, and bone involvement is frequently asymptomatic. Furthermore, it may serve as a reminder that bone involvement is more common in white female patients. Importantly, most patients with bone sarcoidosis have a good response to corticosteroids used in combination with methotrexate.

Case presentation

We present a case of a 70-year-old white woman with multisystem granulomatous disease involving her lungs, bones and lymph nodes. The patient had a background of chronic rhinosinusitis that was treated with intranasal corticosteroids. She had no other relevant medical or family history. She presented initially at another centre with a lump in the left side of her neck and further imaging revealed extensive supraclavicular, mediastinal, hilar and intra-abdominal lymphadenopathy. A supraclavicular lymph node biopsy confirmed non-suppurative, non-caseating granulomatous lymphadenitis. At that time comprehensive lung function testing was normal: FEV1 (forced expiratory volume in 1 s) 2.54 L (98% predicted), FVC (forced vital capacity) 3.01 L (89% predicted), TLC (total lung capacity) 4.79 L (92% predicted) and DLCO (diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide) of 24.03 mL/min/mm Hg (110% predicted). Consideration was given towards tuberculosis, but due to the lack of culture positivity and in the absence of systemic symptomatology, sarcoidosis was thought to be more likely. However, as the patient was clinically well she was not started on any therapy.

Subsequently, over the next 5 years, she developed progressive breathlessness and productive cough with discoloured sputum prompting referral to our centre. CT chest showed progression of pulmonary parenchymal infiltrates as well as the longstanding lymphadenopathy. Lung function testing now showed a mixed obstructive and restrictive defect. The functional and clinical deterioration was consistent with the progressive parenchymal appearances on CT imaging. Endobronchial lung biopsy revealed non-necrotising granulomatous inflammation while a BAL specimen showed scanty growth of Cryptococcus neoformans and moderate growth of Staphylococcus aureus. The patient received intravenous ceftriaxone and had a good initial response to treatment with resolution of cough and sputum production. She also completed 3 months of oral fluconazole for suspected cryptococcal infection. Although a diagnosis of sarcoidosis was considered most likely, the patient was not initiated on systemic corticosteroids at the time. This decision was made because of the clinical response to antibiotics and due to concerns about the cryptococcal and staphylococcal growth.

Subsequent outpatient review confirmed that the initial clinical response to antibiotic therapy was not maintained with further deterioration in her exercise tolerance and increased breathlessness. The productive cough had improved and there was no neck-stiffness, headaches, or subjective fevers.

On examination, she was hemodynamically stable and afebrile. She had good air entry bilaterally, a clear chest with no crackles or wheezes and her saturation was 98% on room air. There were no extrapulmonary signs of sarcoidosis on physical examination. The patient also had no skin lesions, cellulitis, arthritis, ocular abnormalities or abdominal pain indicative of disseminated cryptococcosis. Nonetheless, a craniofacial CT was ordered to exclude disseminated cryptococcosis before initiating immunosuppression. This revealed multiple lytic lesions, with involvement of the calvarium, the clivus and the paranasal sinuses. A clival lesion was biopsied as it appeared representative and readily accessible and histopathology revealed granulomas without vasculitis but with bone resorption. This was considered somewhat atypical for sarcoidosis and therefore the patient underwent further investigations to exclude an underlying infection and other granulomatous diseases. However, no conclusive evidence was found that her presentation was due to widespread infection or another granulomatous condition. Therefore, the patient was treated with oral prednisolone and methotrexate, which led to significant clinical and radiological improvement (for overview of clinical course, see figure 1).

Figure 1

Schematic overview of the clinical course of events and the patient’s corresponding FEV1. FEV1, forced expiratory volume in 1 s.

Investigations

When first reviewed at our centre, lung function tests revealed a mixed obstructive and restrictive picture: FEV1 1.43 L (64% predicted), FVC 2.15 L (74% predicted), TLC 4.52 L (88% predicted) and DLCO of 16.42 mL/mm Hg/min (83% predicted). High-resolution CT chest confirmed a perilymphatic nodular pattern and diffuse symmetric mediastinal and hilar adenopathy (figure 2A). The parenchymal progression on CT imaging was consistent with the patient’s functional and clinical deterioration.

Figure 2

Unenhanced axial CT scan reconstructed with mediastinal algorithm demonstrates bilateral hilar adenopathy (A). Multidetector CT with sagittal reformat on bone window demonstrates some of the lytic lesions, with involvement of the clivus, occipital bone and the C2 vertebral body (B). Postcontrast T1 weighted SPACE sequence with fat saturation demonstrates contrast enhancement of these osseous lesions of the clivus, occipital bone and C2 vertebra. MRI demonstrates that the C2 lesion involves the vertebral body and odontoid process (C). Clivus biopsy showing an area of bony destruction associated with well-formed, non-necrotising granulomas (D).

During the course of her illness, the patient was extensively investigated for other granulomatous diseases.

Full blood count, urea and electrolytes, liver function tests, parathyroid hormone and C reactive protein were within normal ranges on admission. Her urine microscopy revealed no haematuria, proteinuria or casts. Serum protein electrophoresis revealed no significant abnormalities. A repeat antinuclear antigen, extranuclear antigen, tuberculosis interferon gamma release assay and serum cryptococcal antigen were all persistently negative. Although the patient previously had a negative antineutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibody (ANCA), immunofluorescence staining and ELISA assays were repeated, due to the extensive upper airway involvement on CT. Cytoplasmic ANCA (C-ANCA) was negative, but her perinuclear ANCA (P-ANCA) was positive on immunofluorescence staining. ELISA assays for both myeloperoxidase (MPO) and proteinase 3 (PR3) were negative and titres were unrecordably low. Lumbar puncture confirmed normal opening pressure, no cells and a negative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) cryptococcal antigen.

A craniofacial CT revealed multiple lytic lesions involving the calvarium, the clivus (figure 2B) and the paranasal sinuses (left frontal sinus, bilateral ethmoid sinuses and left maxillary sinus). Subsequently, a brain MRI confirmed focal, circumscribed enhancing lesions involving the calvarium, clivus and visualised upper cervical spine (figure 2C).

Frontal sinus and clivus biopsy revealed well-formed, non-necrotising, destructive granulomas, without vasculitis (figure 2D). Fungal stain and culture, and acid-fast bacilli were all negative but there was a light growth of Staphylococcus epidermidis on a frontal sinus swab and clivus tissue sample.

Differential diagnosis

Disseminated cryptococcal infection was considered due to the scanty growth of Cryptococcus neoformans on the recently performed bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL), as well as the extensive bony involvement. Ultimately, this appeared highly unlikely due to the well-formed granulomas on histopathology, negative cryptococcal antigens on serum and CSF, negative fungal growth and stain on biopsies and swabs, and the overall appearance of our patient with no systemic signs and symptoms of widespread fungal sepsis.

Due to the extensive sinus involvement on CT and positive P-ANCA, granulomatosis with polyangiitis was also entertained. The well-formed, non-necrotising granulomas on histopathology, the negative MPO and PR3 ELISA assays and the slow progression of the disease made this unlikely. Importantly, two types of ANCA assays are in wide use and this includes the indirect immunofluorescence assay (P-ANCA and C-ANCA) and ELISA (MPO and PR3). Of these two techniques, the immunofluorescence is more sensitive, and the ELISA is more specific. The optimal approach to clinical testing for ANCA is therefore to perform both immunofluorescence and ELISA to detect antibodies against the vasculitis specific target antigens.16 17

Furthermore, a positive P-ANCA immunofluorescence staining pattern may also be detected in a wide variety of inflammatory illnesses, including sarcoidosis, and has a low specificity for vasculitis.18 The clinical significance of this non-specific finding in these disorders remains unclear.19 A positive immunofluorescence assay should therefore always prompt testing by ELISA to determine the specific antibody (or antibodies) responsible for the pattern.19

Although cryptococcal infection and granulomatosis with polyangiitis were the two main differential diagnoses, the patient was extensively investigated to exclude other conditions that could cause multiple osteolytic lesions.

Multiple myeloma was excluded with a normal serum protein electrophoresis and immunofixation, tuberculosis was deemed highly unlikely due to the negative tuberculosis interferon gamma release assay, negative acid-fast bacilli and negative TB culture. A normal parathyroid hormone level excluded hyperparathyroidism and multiple brown tumours.

Finally, the sinus and clivus biopsies excluded other causes of osteolytic lesions including metastatic bone disease, primary non-Hodgkin's lymphoma of bone and Langerhans cell histiocytosis.

Therefore, widespread sarcoidosis with bone involvement was considered to be the most probable diagnosis.

Treatment

The patient was initiated on oral prednisolone 30 mg daily as well as oral methotrexate 10 mg weekly.

This decision was made in accordance with the literature that shows that corticosteroids remain the most common first-line therapy for bone and sinus sarcoidosis.3 10 In addition to being the most commonly prescribed steroid-sparing agent in sarcoidosis, methotrexate appears especially useful in cases of bone and sinonasal sarcoidosis.3 11 12

The patient was also reinitiated on oral fluconazole for the Cryptococcus neoformans. She was previously treated for 3 months and although the optimal treatment of cryptococcal pneumonia is uncertain, treatment generally consists of 6–12 months of oral fluconazole.15 While we were unable to undoubtedly confirm whether the Cryptococcus neoformans was truly pathological, we believed that the benefits of treatment outweighed the risks, especially given the ongoing immunosuppression.

Immunosuppression is a risk factor for early death in skull base osteomyelitis and conditions altering the vascularity of bone appears to be a risk factor for superimposed osteomyelitis.20 21 The patient also had sinus involvement and sinusitis can be a predisposing factor for frontal bone and maxillary osteomyelitis.21 Although it was difficult to establish whether the Staphylococcus epidermidis, cultured from a frontal sinus swab and clivus tissue sample, was a contaminant, or whether the destructed bone was secondarily infected, we decided to treat the patient with intravenous vancomycin for 2 weeks followed by an oral course of clindamycin for 3 months.

Due to the extensive bone involvement, an orthopaedic consultation was obtained to assess the risk of pathologic fractures and spinal cord compression. This was felt to be extremely unlikely and no surgical intervention was indicated.

Outcome and follow-up

After the initiation of prednisolone and methotrexate, the patient reported dramatic improvement in breathlessness and she also had significant radiological improvement on follow-up imaging. An outpatient F18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/CT scan, 3 months after the initiation of immunosuppressants, revealed marked improvement with no definite evidence for residual FDG-avid disease (figure 3). The previously demonstrated intense FDG-uptake within the lymph nodes above and below the diaphragm, within multiple skeletal lesions and within lesions involving the lungs, liver and spleen all resolved (figure 4A and B). The CT scan also showed interval improvement of the peribronchovascular and perifissural nodules bilaterally. Furthermore, the patient also had significantly improved lung function tests with normalisation of ventilatory capacity, transfer factor and lung volumes. After previously demonstrating a mixed obstructive and restrictive picture, she now had normal comprehensive lung function: FEV1 1.97 L (88% predicted), FVC 2.84 L (99% predicted), TLC 4.93 L (96% predicted) and DLCO 19.5 mL/mm Hg/min (98% predicted). The patient also reported significant improvement in her chronic sinusitis symptoms. Due to the patient’s clinical improvement, the prednisolone was gradually tapered and the methotrexate was steadily increased. The patient was very compliant with her treatment and the main tolerability issue was weight gain due to the prednisolone. This subsequently improved after the dose was reduced.

Figure 3

PET/CT scan showing marked improvement after initiation of immunosuppressive therapy with no definitive evidence for residual FDG-avid disease (right), compared with previously demonstrated intense FDG-uptake within the lymph nodes above and below the diaphragm, within multiple skeletal lesions and within lesions involving the lungs, liver and spleen (left). FDG, fluorodeoxyglucose; PET, positron emission tomography.

Figure 4

Midline sagittal fused FDG PET-CT image at presentation demonstrates extensive osseous involvement in addition to thoracic and abdominal lymphadenopathy (A). Midline sagittal fused FDG PET-CT image 14 months later post-treatment demonstrates substantial disease regression (B). FDG, fluorodeoxyglucose; PET, positron emission tomography.

The marked clinical and radiological response to prednisolone and methotrexate provided further reassurance for the diagnosis of widespread sarcoidosis with bone involvement.

Discussion

Sarcoidosis is a multisystem disease characterised by well-formed non-caseating granulomas developing in many organs. Although the lungs and the lymph nodes are most commonly affected, the disease can involve any organ system.1 Sinonasal sarcoidosis is relatively rare and the incidence appears to be between 0.7% and 6%.2 However, as the symptoms of patients with sinonasal sarcoidosis resemble the symptoms of chronic rhinitis and chronic inflammatory rhinosinusitis, sinonasal sarcoidosis might be an overlooked disease manifestation.3 Furthermore, sarcoidosis of the paranasal sinuses may be difficult to distinguish from common acute or chronic sinusitis, even for ENT specialists.2 CT scan typically shows non-specific signs of chronic sinus inflammation with mucosal thickening and opacification of one or more sinuses.22 Destruction of nasal sinuses is a feature of more chronic disease.11 Multiorgan involvement is common among patients with sinonasal involvement and treatment is usually targeted to the most severely affected system.22 In rare cases of isolated sinonasal sarcoidosis, local corticosteroids could be used alone.3 10 23 The systemic treatment needed for other disease manifestations may directly benefit the upper airway. However, local treatment for upper airway symptoms may still be useful.23

Osseous sarcoidosis is an uncommon manifestation, reported in 3%–13% of patients.4 Bone involvement appears to be more common in middle-aged and elderly white women.5 6 Zhou et al demonstrated that white patients were three times more likely than blacks to have bone sarcoidosis while another study of 20 patients with bone sarcoidosis reported that 95% of these patients were white. Although this difference may reflect demographic characteristics at their institutions, it raises the possibility of a racial predilection.5 6 Furthermore, most patients in these studies were women and the median age at diagnosis of bone sarcoidosis was 46.5 and 48.9 years, respectively.5 6 Older studies found that the hands and feet are most commonly affected, with axial bone involvement rarely reported.4 However, axial bone involvement may be more common than previously reported, since earlier studies relied mostly on plain X-rays, which may be less sensitive for axial bone lesions.5 Newer imaging modalities such as MRI and PET/CT scanning have demonstrated a larger incidence of vertebral involvement, and a recent retrospective study demonstrated that up to 70% of patients who have skeletal sarcoidosis may have spinal disease.5

It appears likely that previous estimates of bone involvement reflect an underestimate of the true incidence, because although PET/CT scanning is useful in detecting asymptomatic bone lesions, it is not routinely performed in sarcoidosis.5 Mostard et al reported that FDG enhancement, suggesting bone involvement, may be present in up to 34% of patients with PET/CT positive sarcoidosis.24 This suggests that PET/CT scanning in asymptomatic sarcoidosis patients can better assess the extent of the disease, including possible bone involvement.5 However, since the differential diagnosis of these suspect lesions also include malignancy and infection, a biopsy is usually required for confirmation.5 8

Skull sarcoidosis is nonetheless uncommon: a recent systematic review yielded only 22 known cases, all of which were case reports.9 In 35% of these cases, skull sarcoidosis was detected incidentally in asymptomatic patients.9 The most common radiological finding in patients with skull sarcoidosis is the presence of single or multiple lytic lesions.9 Most patients with bone involvement have a history of longstanding sarcoidosis with systemic manifestations other than bone sarcoidosis.6

The mechanisms of osteolysis in sarcoidosis remain unclear. Mechanisms that have been suggested include: high levels of 1,25 (OH)2 D3 activity stimulating osteoclastic activity, local granuloma-induced osteoclastic reaction and the sarcoid granuloma being a source of an osteoclastic activating factor inducing bone resorption.

However, none of these hypotheses have been shown to provide a satisfactory explanation related to the presence of bone lesions in sarcoidosis.4

Corticosteroids remain the most commonly prescribed first-line therapy for bone and sinonasal sarcoidosis, but prolonged corticosteroid therapy is usually associated with long-term complications.5 10 Methotrexate or hydroxychloroquine have often been used, usually in combination with corticosteroids, in order to allow lower corticosteroid dose.5 Methotrexate is the most widely studied steroid-sparing agent for sarcoidosis and it has been reported useful for a variety of organ symptoms but especially where there is bone involvement.5 25 Methotrexate also appears to be the most commonly prescribed steroid-sparing agent for sinonasal sarcoidosis and it has been reported useful in destructive nasal disease.11 12 Other second-line agents including azathioprine and third-line treatments such as anti-TNF inhibitors are often prescribed for patients with severe sarcoidosis, whose disease cannot be controlled by low-dose corticosteroids and may represent alternative options, although these are not well studied in bone sarcoidosis.5

A strength of our report is that it demonstrates how the involvement of a multidisciplinary team could ultimately lead to improved patient care. This included an infectious disease physician, radiologists, orthopaedic surgeons, pathologists, an ENT specialist, a general physician and the patient’s respiratory physician. Furthermore, our meticulous clinical and radiological follow-up allowed us to accurately assess the patient’s response to treatment and associated adverse effects.

However, this remains a report of a single patient’s response to treatment and although the appearances are not typical of an undiagnosed infection, it is impossible to completely exclude an underlying infective agent. Importantly, the dramatic clinical and radiological response to prednisolone and methotrexate provided further reassurance for the diagnosis of widespread sarcoidosis with bone involvement.

Patient’s perspective

I am extremely grateful for the extensive investigations which reassured me that other conditions were not missed. I am also very pleased with the improvement of my symptoms after the initiation of treatment.

Learning points

  • Bone involvement in sarcoidosis is frequently asymptomatic and can be widespread with multiple lytic lesions.

  • Osseous sarcoidosis appears to be more common in middle-aged and elderly white women.

  • Although skull involvement is rare, any bone in the body can be affected by sarcoidosis.

  • Sarcoidosis involving the spine may be more common than previously thought.

  • Most patients with bone sarcoidosis have a good response to corticosteroids used in combination with methotrexate.

Ethics statements

Footnotes

  • Twitter @HencoNel93

  • Contributors HCN wrote the manuscript and did the literature review. BD and BA assisted with the selection of radiological images and their appropriate captions as well as the appropriate radiological descriptions in the text. EG is the senior author who supervised the work and proofread the text.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

References

Use of this content is subject to our disclaimer